Tyler - it appears you waded through the conflicting info. {;>) " Dude - my 63 Simca handles like it's on rails, goes 135 MPH and gets 20 MPG - it is the coolest" By nature we usually 'defend' our choices /purchases/investments as being good and 'right' - sometimes I actually luck out. GO In a message dated 12/3/2013 6:21:36 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, casioqv@usermail.com writes: I don't have enough experience to help with the review, but I can't wait to read it! In deciding which small trailer sailor to buy, I found extremely conflicting information on the relative windward performance of these boats. Perhaps it would be possible to find or generate some objective data on this? Thanks, Tyler M15 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Small Craft Advisor" <smallcraftadvisor@earthlink.net> To: "montgomery boats" <montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2013 9:11:52 AM Subject: M_Boats: P-15 vs M-15 vs CP-16 Hi Folks, We're taking an unusual tack with our next feature-length boat review— we're going to do a comparison of the Potter 15, Montgomery 15, and Com-Pac 16. We're not looking to bash any of these boats, we just want help potential used-boat buyers understand the relative pros and cons. As always we'd like to include feedback from owner-sailors. If you've owned or regularly sailed any TWO (or all three) of these boats and would be interested in participating (and possibly being quoted), please send us an e-mail at: smallcraftadvisor@earthlink.net and we'll return our survey questions. Thanks for your consideration. Sincerely, Joshua Colvin Small Craft Advisor PO Box 1343 Port Townsend, WA 98368 www.smallcraftadvisor.com PH 800-979-1930 PH 360-379-1930