[math-fun] England sees the light.
This is a problem that's worried me for quite some time : if and when there are 51 United States, then how should the resulting 51 stars be arranged on the "Stars and Stripes" flag?
It's all very well to plan ahead, John, but I don't think Tony Blair could take the role reversal of being an American province. California would object to losing its #1 position in population and wackiness. And we're supposed to guarantee our states a Republican form of government -- what would become of the Queen? Besides, we don't even speak the same language. :-) [Or :-o) in the British spelling.] John has * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * for the 49 star flag. The 49 star flag was only current for a year (or two? ~1958). My memory is that the rows were staggered, like this: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * But I'm not sure if the pattern was this way or left-right reversed -- ie, with the staggering being on odd rows instead of even. Rich rcs@cs.arizona.edu
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Richard Schroeppel wrote:
It's all very well to plan ahead, John, but I don't think Tony Blair could take the role reversal of being an American province....
I was actually thinking Puerto Rico might be next...
John has [a "square"] for the 49 star flag. My memory is that the rows were staggered ...
Since I wasn't even aware that it had ever been used, I chose my wording carefully so as not to imply that this square actually WAS the design. It was just an obvious possibility. John McKay has suggested a basically triangular design, made of three 15-star triangles surrounding a 6-star one. I was tacitly supposing that the outline should be roughly the same shape of rectangle as the traditional ones, but maybe we shouldn't be so tame? JHC
On Friday 05 September 2003 08:28 am, Richard Schroeppel wrote:
This is a problem that's worried me for quite some time :
if and when there are 51 United States, then how should the resulting 51 stars be arranged on the "Stars and Stripes" flag?
It's all very well to plan ahead, John, but I don't think Tony Blair could take the role reversal of being an American province. California would object to losing its #1 position in population and wackiness. And we're supposed to guarantee our states a Republican form of government -- what would become of the Queen?
Besides, we don't even speak the same language. :-) [Or :-o) in the British spelling.]
Richard has a legitimate point, particularly the following proposed 51 star flag arrangement looks suspiciously British. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Regards Otto otto@olympus.net
participants (3)
-
John Conway -
otto -
Richard Schroeppel