I have to admit, it's hard to believe there's that much to say about music theory that such a book could be worth $59.53 new. Of course, * notes are largely determined by frequency, i.e. a real number; * the human ear perceives a doubled frequency as "the same note", kind of; * it also perceives combinations of notes with frequency ratios being fractions with small denominators as pleasing. Beyond this, it's all experimentation with what sounds good. (On the other hand, there are some extremely complex musical traditions. Some (East) Indian music relies on a scale of 40+ notes, and there is much to be said about it. Though I wouldn't call it "theory".) --Dan Hilarie wrote: << I've come across a book of essays titled "Music Theory and Mathematics" which includes writing by Jack Douthett, John Clough, et al. Is anyone here familiar with their work?
_____________________________________________________________________ "It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that certain je ne sais quoi." --Peter Schickele
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Dan Asimov <dasimov@earthlink.net> wrote:
I have to admit, it's hard to believe there's that much to say about music theory that such a book could be worth $59.53 new.
I've had a great many students who would say the same thing about math. Kerry -- lkmitch@gmail.com www.kerrymitchellart.com http://spacefilling.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Dan Asimov <dasimov@earthlink.net> wrote:
I have to admit, it's hard to believe there's that much to say about music theory that such a book could be worth $59.53 new.
You might be surprised by what's lurking there: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week234.html -- Mike Stay - metaweta@gmail.com http://math.ucr.edu/~mike http://reperiendi.wordpress.com
Yes, the John Baez page http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week234.html is a good start on the subject material in "Music Theory and Mathematics", and I like his comment about mathematicians and musicians (like Mars and Arizona). Not knowing much about musical composition, I'm unsure what to make of the group-theoretic angle on scales and chords. The mathematics seems cute but not deep (despite the "twin prime" tie-in), and from glancing at the essays I gather that few, if any, new insights into musical structure have been gained by the approach. Perhaps there hasn't been enough analysis of 19th century music to confirm or deny the hypothetical relationships. Hilarie
participants (4)
-
Dan Asimov -
Hilarie Orman -
Kerry Mitchell -
Mike Stay