RE: Re[2]: [math-fun] Re: Polynomial primogeniture
Richard Guy writes: << ... what is significant is not the actual density over the first so many values, which clearly has to tend to zero in all cases, but the {\bf asymptotic} density, which, if we believe Hardy \& Littlewood (see {\bf A1}), is always $c\sqrt n/\ln n$, and the best that can be done \hGidx{asymptotic density} is to make the value of $c$ as large as possible. ...
Yes, that's exactly what I'm interested in -- the asymptotic behavior. Richard: Is the Hardy-Wright asymptotic density of c sqrt(n) ^ (ln (n)) (please confirm that my parentheses are properly placed!) specifically for *quadratic* polymonials, or for *all* polynomials? Thanks, Dan
Off the top of my head, the H & L conjecture should have `k-th root' in place of `square root' for polynomials of degree k. R. On Tue, 25 May 2004, Dan Asimov wrote:
Richard Guy writes:
<< ... what is significant is not the actual density over the first so many values, which clearly has to tend to zero in all cases, but the {\bf asymptotic} density, which, if we believe Hardy \& Littlewood (see {\bf A1}), is always $c\sqrt n/\ln n$, and the best that can be done \hGidx{asymptotic density} is to make the value of $c$ as large as possible. ...
Yes, that's exactly what I'm interested in -- the asymptotic behavior.
Richard: Is the Hardy-Wright asymptotic density of c sqrt(n) ^ (ln (n)) (please confirm that my parentheses are properly placed!) specifically for *quadratic* polymonials, or for *all* polynomials?
Thanks,
Dan
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
participants (2)
-
Dan Asimov -
Richard Guy