Scientists recently decoded a clay tablet from ancient Babylonia that dates to around 3,700 years ago, and found that it contains the oldest trigonometric table in the world. https://www.livescience.com/60227-babylonian-clay-tablet-trigonometry.html Brent
Hm, hard to tell from the popular press I've seen about this. People have been arguing about the meaning and use of Plymption 322 for decades. I don't know what's an actual advance and what's the result of the University of New South Wales PR department. --Michael On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Brent Meeker <meekerdb@verizon.net> wrote:
Scientists recently decoded a clay tablet from ancient Babylonia that dates to around 3,700 years ago, and found that it contains the oldest trigonometric table in the world.
https://www.livescience.com/60227-babylonian-clay-tablet-trigonometry.html
Brent
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
-- Forewarned is worth an octopus in the bush.
Hm, hard to tell from the popular press I've seen about this.
The article itself appears to be online: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0315086017300691
I knew I'd seen this picture before (Plimpton tablet 322). The 1948 book "Number Theory and its History", by Oystein Ore of Yale, has a picture of the tablet on p. 175, and discussion nearby, identifying it as a trig table of angles 45 to 31 degrees, with a spacing of about 1 degree. Ore refers to Neugebauer & Sachs' 1945 paper about (catalog of?) the mathematical Plimpton tablets. My impression is that Ore is the originator of the trig-table interpretation, but I haven't looked at the N&S paper. Ore notes that finding integer right triangles with roughly 1-degree spaced angles, and having other-legs with terminating base 60 reciprocals is not a trivial problem. He speculates about the method used. It looks like you need to find a rational number u/v near tan(45-theta/2), where u and v have only 2,3,5 as prime divisors. The entry for 45deg is 119,169; which are one leg and the hypotenuse of a 119-120-169 right triangle. In modern terms, this is the result of squaring 12+5i (=119+120i). Squaring doubles the angle, and swapping imaginary & real parts complements the angle. The imaginary leg is 2uv; restricting the prime divisors guarantees a terminating base 60 reciprocal. I only skimmed Mansfield-Wildberger, so I probably missed what they've added to the discussion. They have 30+ references, including N&S but not Ore. Rich -------- Quoting Hans Havermann <gladhobo@bell.net>:
Hm, hard to tell from the popular press I've seen about this.
The article itself appears to be online: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0315086017300691
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
Evelyn Lamb has a 'Don't Fall for Babylonian Trigonometry Hype' in Scientific American: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/roots-of-unity/dont-fall-for-babylonian...
participants (4)
-
Brent Meeker -
Hans Havermann -
Michael Kleber -
rcs@xmission.com