Re: [math-fun] very cool perm poly decomposition over GF(p)
Hi Jim: Sorry, I don't know her personally (although I've seen her on many YouTube talks), so tell Dr. Landau that I'm sorry for using an inappropriate name. Dr. Henry Baker At 01:03 PM 4/3/2016, James Propp wrote:
On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Henry Baker <hbaker1@pipeline.com> wrote:
I just found a really cool polynomial decomposition algorithm which works beautifully for polys over GF(p) whose degree is <p, i.e., particularly those which are permutation polynomials. I believe this algorithm is due to Ms. Susan Landau (now @ WPI), although I can't be 100% sure about this w/o asking her.
I know Susan Landau, and I am 99% sure she would rather be called "Dr. Landau" or "Prof. Landau" than "Ms. Landau". (Though there are worse things you could call her, I guess, like "Mrs. Neil Immerman".)
Jim Propp
I had exactly the same thought. —Dan
On Apr 3, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Henry Baker <hbaker1@pipeline.com> wrote:
I know Susan Landau, and I am 99% sure she would rather be called "Dr. Landau" or "Prof. Landau" than "Ms. Landau".
No good deed goes unpunished. I specifically called out Dr. Prof. Landau (or Prof. Dr. Landau, or whatever) because the article I referenced didn't give proper credit to her (IMHO). If I am correct, she did this work as a graduate student prior to achieving the prescribed honorifics. I won't make the same mistake again. From now on, it's Gauss's Lemma/Method number 279 or Euler's Theorem # whatever, and she can now join the thousands of nameless, faceless people whose own theorems/methods will never be identified with them. At 01:38 PM 4/3/2016, Dan Asimov wrote:
I had exactly the same thought. ÂDan
On Apr 3, 20116, at 1:13 PM, Henry Baker <hbaker1@pipeline.com> wrote:
I know Susan Landau, and I am 99% sure she would rather be called "Dr. Landau" or "Prof. Landau" than "Ms. Landau".
Good point! I stand corrected (or at least better-informed); if the work being discussed predated her doctoral degree, I suspect she shouldn't have the honorific "Dr." in connection with that result. And perhaps if she did the work when she was really young, the appropriate first name is "Susie"? :-) I'm sorry if my response to Henry's post focussed on the issue of honorifics, rather than his admirable efforts to give credit where it's due. I meant it to be gentler than it evidently came across. (Canonical email-writer's error...) I will feel I have I been deservedly humbled if someone now calls ME out for an elitist over-concern with academic credentials. Jim (formerly "Jimmy") Propp On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Henry Baker <hbaker1@pipeline.com> wrote:
No good deed goes unpunished.
I specifically called out Dr. Prof. Landau (or Prof. Dr. Landau, or whatever) because the article I referenced didn't give proper credit to her (IMHO). If I am correct, she did this work as a graduate student prior to achieving the prescribed honorifics.
I won't make the same mistake again. From now on, it's Gauss's Lemma/Method number 279 or Euler's Theorem # whatever, and she can now join the thousands of nameless, faceless people whose own theorems/methods will never be identified with them.
At 01:38 PM 4/3/2016, Dan Asimov wrote:
I had exactly the same thought. —Dan
On Apr 3, 20116, at 1:13 PM, Henry Baker <hbaker1@pipeline.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
I know Susan Landau, and I am 99% sure she would rather be called "Dr. Landau" or "Prof. Landau" than "Ms. Landau".
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com <javascript:;> https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
I don't see it that way. If it's her thesis, then it's Dr. Landau's thesis. If it's not in there, it's still a theorem of Dr. Landau's, [proved when she was a grad student], but there's no need to cite its circumstances. —Dan
On Apr 3, 2016, at 4:43 PM, James Propp <jamespropp@gmail.com> wrote:
Good point! I stand corrected (or at least better-informed); if the work being discussed predated her doctoral degree, I suspect she shouldn't have the honorific "Dr." in connection with that result.
And perhaps if she did the work when she was really young, the appropriate first name is "Susie"? :-)
I'm sorry if my response to Henry's post focussed on the issue of honorifics, rather than his admirable efforts to give credit where it's due. I meant it to be gentler than it evidently came across. (Canonical email-writer's error...)
I will feel I have I been deservedly humbled if someone now calls ME out for an elitist over-concern with academic credentials.
Jim (formerly "Jimmy") Propp
On Sunday, April 3, 2016, Henry Baker <hbaker1@pipeline.com> wrote:
No good deed goes unpunished.
I specifically called out Dr. Prof. Landau (or Prof. Dr. Landau, or whatever) because the article I referenced didn't give proper credit to her (IMHO). If I am correct, she did this work as a graduate student prior to achieving the prescribed honorifics.
I won't make the same mistake again. From now on, it's Gauss's Lemma/Method number 279 or Euler's Theorem # whatever, and she can now join the thousands of nameless, faceless people whose own theorems/methods will never be identified with them.
At 01:38 PM 4/3/2016, Dan Asimov wrote:
I had exactly the same thought. —Dan
On Apr 3, 20116, at 1:13 PM, Henry Baker <hbaker1@pipeline.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
I know Susan Landau, and I am 99% sure she would rather be called "Dr. Landau" or "Prof. Landau" than "Ms. Landau".
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com <javascript:;> https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
participants (3)
-
Dan Asimov -
Henry Baker -
James Propp