Re: [math-fun] Anti-kissing number puzzle
Aha. My copy (3rd edition) is not at hand. Can you please mention the page and/or chapter where that's found? —Dan ----- Conway's Sphere Packing, Lattices and Groups has an interesting (and surprising!) discussion of this particular case. -----
I can satisfy myself that 4 is too few, and 6 is enough. I suspect 5 kissing spheres always admit a 6th, but I haven't been able to prove it. So "5 or 6" is as close as I can get to an answer at the moment. On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 11:02 PM Dan Asimov <dasimov@earthlink.net> wrote:
Aha. My copy (3rd edition) is not at hand. Can you please mention the page and/or chapter where that's found?
—Dan
----- Conway's Sphere Packing, Lattices and Groups has an interesting (and surprising!) discussion of this particular case. -----
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
participants (2)
-
Allan Wechsler -
Dan Asimov