This may be relevant: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/03/business/dealbook/bitcoin-craig-wright-sat... <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/03/business/dealbook/bitcoin-craig-wright-satoshi-nakamoto.html> —Dan
On May 2, 2016, at 6:34 AM, Gareth McCaughan <gareth.mccaughan@pobox.com> wrote:
On 02/05/2016 12:28, Eric Angelini wrote:
http://www.drcraigwright.net/jean-paul-sartre-signing-significance/
Seems to be as fake as a very fake thing:
https://github.com/patio11/wrightverification https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hflr3/craig_wrights_signature_is_...
On the other hand, someone who should really know better says he's convinced (not only by the weird bogus signature antics but also by having talked to the guy):
http://gavinandresen.ninja/satoshi
... and apparently this is the response of the Bitcoin team:
https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/727078284345917441
Make of all that what you will, but personally I'll be very surprised if it turns out that Wright really is Satoshi.