More likely, I need to write more clearly and with fewer mistakes. Also I don't think I actually stated the result you have on smallest seed. So no need for any apologies. If you want to be completely correct, I owe Michael Kleber an apology for repeating something he proved, and I don't have an excuse of his writeup being unclear. On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 11:17 AM, David Wilson <davidwwilson@comcast.net> wrote:
Well, then, it looks like I owe Tom an apology, he apparently preceeded me in all of my conclusions. Perhaps I need to read a bit more before writing.
On 1/7/2012 1:03 PM, Tom Rokicki wrote:
Typos, sorry:
3. Show k(b,x,n) where gcd(x,b^n)<b never includes the b-1 digit. 4. Show k(b,x,n) where gcd(x,b^n)>b always includes all digits at
should be
3. Show k(b,x,n) where b^n/gcd(x,b^n)<b never includes the b-1 digit. 4. Show k(b,x,n) where b^n/gcd(x,b^n)>b always includes all digits at
_______________________________________________
math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
-- -- http://cube20.org/ -- http://golly.sf.net/ --