20 May
2014
20 May
'14
10:28 a.m.
Yes, I was confused. I retract the second part. -- Gene
________________________________ From: Henry Baker <hbaker1@pipeline.com> To: Eugene Salamin <gene_salamin@yahoo.com>; math-fun <math-fun@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 8:39 AM Subject: Re: [math-fun] Stupid Cayley-Hamilton question
I agree with the first part "it is necessary and sufficient that M(B,x) divide C(A,x)", but not the second part "the multiplicity in B cannot exceed the multiplicity in A".