That's not exactly what I meant. Rather, one will see approximate short white line segments (in the complement of the dots) almost everywhere, since the dots are lined up parallel to two local axes. That's all I meant. The *details* of how these axes might line up, and why in some places they fit together to make apparently circular curves, would take a careful analysis of the specifics of the equation defining the locations of the dots, (r,theta) = (sqrt(n), n*(sqrt(5)-1)), n = 1,2,3,.... --Dan Allan wrote: << I think we are all agreed that most of the visible aliasing we see in the 50,000-dot image is due to pixel quantization. But Dan Asimov argues that even if we could get rid of pixel quantization, we would still see some moire-like effects. If I understand his argument, he is saying that in each area of the phi-based sunflower, the array of dots approximates the vertices of a lattice of parallelograms; the axis vectors of this lattice distort slowly as you move to nearby areas, and occasionally snap to a different set of axes. He anticipates "phase transitions" between domains governed by different axis vectors, and expects that these transitions will appear as visible discontinuities. I agree (again, hedging that I might not be following Dan's thoughts correctly) that different regions have different natural coordinate systems, but I disagree that the transitions will be abrupt or visible. Instead, I expect them to shade into each other imperceptibly; along the borders between these domains there will be regions that appear ambiguous, where one will be able to choose semiconsciouly (as in the Necker illusion) which lattice one sees.
________________________________________________________________________________________ It goes without saying that .