23 Nov
2015
23 Nov
'15
5:13 p.m.
Clearly. —Dan
On Nov 23, 2015, at 4:05 PM, Michael Kleber <michael.kleber@gmail.com> wrote:
In the decimal approximation case, you get a palindrome if you truncate after three terms. In the cf you get one if you truncate after *any number* of terms!
--Michael On Nov 23, 2015 5:06 PM, "Dan Asimov" <dasimov@earthlink.net> wrote:
In what sense? There is no orientation-reversing map of the sequence of C.F. integers to itself that maps each integer to itself.
—Dan
On Nov 23, 2015, at 1:38 PM, Henry Baker <hbaker1@pipeline.com> wrote:
But why stop with 161; cf(phi) is also a palindrome.