In general, I don't think that any amount of *passive* observation will be convincing. Science is only believable when *independent* experiments are supplied with *independent* random streams of bits; i.e., if I am allowed to perform the experiment myself using my own source of random bits. ("Supply a wiggle in, and see what wiggles out") Of course, this raises the following possibility (sci-fi writers, listen up!): In the future, the NSA will be tasked as a monopoly providing all necessary random bits. It does this by producing quantum entangled pairs of particles, supplying the market with one of each pair, and keeping the other particle in labeled storage. If/when the NSA customer "measures" one of the "market" particles, the entangled particle will also assume the same state, so the customer will have his random bit, and the NSA will also be happy. At 02:31 PM 5/31/2017, Dan Asimov wrote:
You have to perform a random binary experiment in front of a crowd of people  so no fooling is allowed  in in such a way that everyone is convinced that the experiment was fair.
The people include some technical experts but many who are not.
What is the simplest / easiest / cheapest way to ensure that the crowd will be convinced that the experiment was fair (the two outcomes had an equal chance of occurring) ???
ÂDan
P.S. I do not have ann answer to this, but maybe there is a "best" answer.