There is no reason not to declare that the first decade/century/millennium was anomalous and was short one year to make things jibe w/ the common usage that the first year of each following decade/year/millennium is that which ends in 00. Otherwise, if you're being hyper-pedantic, what are you going to do about the skipped days in the changeover from the Julian to Gregorian calendar -- the year that wasn't a full year long? On Wed, Jan 1, 2020, 21:51 Leo Broukhis <leob@mailcom.com> wrote:
What's the problem here?
The third decade of the 21st century CE is 2021-2030. The decade called "the 2020s" is 2020-2029.
Leo
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 9:32 AM James Propp <jamespropp@gmail.com> wrote:
I’ve heard that, “officially”, the 21st century began on January 1, 2001, not January 1, 2000.
Do those officials (whoever they are) also contend that the Aughts (or whatever they’re called) didn’t start until 2001, so that likewise the Teens didn’t start until 2011 and the Twenties won’t start until a year from now? Or do they say that the last year of each century is also the first year of a new decade?
Sorry if I’m resurrecting a thread from ten or twenty years ago...
Jim Propp _______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun