Re: [math-fun] highly composite numbers

The problem with trying to prove my conjecture using results from S.Ramanujan: Highly composite numbers, Proc. London Math. Soc. (2) 14 (1915) 347-409. http://ramanujan.sirinudi.org/Volumes/published/ram15.pdf is... It seems Ramanujan made errors. His EQ 261 is not known unless the Riemann hypothesis is assumed. His EQ 262 hence similarly is not known to be valid without assuming RH.