19 Jun
2014
19 Jun
'14
10:45 p.m.
Mike -- I appreciate your belief in my existence. But there's a logical flaw in "I think, therefore I am": Since the premise assumes the existence of an "I" -- using "I" as its subject -- the conclusion is already present in the premise, and so the conclusion adds nothing. --Dan On Jun 19, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Mike Stay <metaweta@gmail.com> wrote:
Therefore you are!
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Dan Asimov <dasimov@earthlink.net> wrote:
Thanks, I think.