19 Feb
2018
19 Feb
'18
1:37 p.m.
On 19/02/2018 19:30, Allan Wechsler wrote:
The following intuitive line of reasoning leads to a contradictory conclusion, and I don't know what's wrong with it. Obviously one of my assumptions or beliefs about spaces with constant Gaussian curvature is wrong, but I can't figure out which.
The bit where I immediately felt "uh-oh, handwaving going on here, not at all convinced" was this:
But as r gets larger, the negative curvature of the ambient hyperbolic space begins to make itself felt, and the circumference goes above 2 pi r, by some factor related to sinh.
I don't see why this should be true. -- g