On p. 48, last line, first paragraph of Mazur/Stein book, shouldn't it be Li(X) = integral 2 to X of (1/log(t)) dt, rather than what is written? On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:06 PM, meekerdb <meekerdb@verizon.net> wrote:
Might be of interest: The link is to draft version which can be downloaded now.
William Stein <https://plus.google.com/u/0/115360165819500279592>
Shared publicly - 9:04 AM <https://plus.google.com/u/0/ 115360165819500279592/posts/ZPjKQzqYju9>
Barry Mazur and I can't seem to find any more typos or mistakes in our book "Prime Numbers and the Riemann Hypothesis": http://wstein.org/rh/ Can anybody good at spotting typos see anything critical that needs to be done before this goes into production at Cambridge University Press?
David Mumford has written the following very nice endorsement for the book: "This book is a soaring ride, starting from the simplest ideas and ending with one of the deepest unsolved problems of mathematics. Unlike so many popular math books puffed up with anecdotal material, the authors here treat the reader as seriously interested in prime numbers and build up the real math in four stages with compelling graphical demonstrations revealing in deeper and deeper ways the hidden music of the primes. If you have ever wondered why so many mathematicians are obsessed with primes, here’s the real deal.”
It goes without saying, but all illustrations and calculations in the book were done using Sage.
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun