You guys don't get an alternate form? I see Alternate form: n^4 + n^4(1/3) I, too, had come to the conclusion that it was thinking of the second "n" as a function (particularly since adding a space between it and the opening parenthesis fixes the problem), but I couldn't figure out how that might explain this particular result. Changing the exponent on the first "n" also changes it on the second, but changing it to a variable completely changes the sorts of results I get, so it's hard to compare. If I change the first "n" to an "m", this issue goes away (while the latter "n" is still clearly treated as a function). --Emma On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Mike Stay <metaweta@gmail.com> wrote:
They're getting n as a variable and n as a function confused: n(1/3) is being read as an evaluation of the function n at the point 1/3 rather than n/3. Replacing the function name with f, the indefinite integral says
int(n^4 + f(1/3)) dn = n^5 + n*f(1/3) + constant
which is correct.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Dan Asimov <dasimov@earthlink.net> wrote:
Nothing said "alternate form" when I went to that page. But they did have an indefinite integral solved incorrectly, and a "global minimum" problem also solved incorrectly.
I think it's buggy.
--Dan
Emma wrote:
On 2012-09-17, at 5:26 PM, Emma Cohen wrote:
Can someone explain the results here? http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=n%5E4+%2B+n%281%2F3%29 I can come up with a hypothesis which explains some of the results, but can't think of anything at all which would explain the "alternate form."
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
-- Mike Stay - metaweta@gmail.com http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~mike http://reperiendi.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun