Here's an imprecisely-stated question about the OEIS that I've had for awhile. What are its "most misplaced" entries? For example the Fibonacci sequence at A000045 is hardly misplaced. Is there something past 50,000 that "should" be in the top 200? (I have no definition for "should" in mind...I welcome potential ideas.) Conversely, is there something in the top 100 that no one is ever looking for? On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Neil Sloane <njasloane@gmail.com> wrote:
Nice video, thanks for the link. I just checked the OEIS, where the relevant sequence is https://oeis.org/A060464, and I was happy to see that Charles Greathouse already added a link there to the video
Best regards Neil
Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation. 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA. Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ. Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com Email: njasloane@gmail.com
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Stuart Anderson < stuart.errol.anderson@gmail.com> wrote:
33 is the lowest unsolved problem in "summing three cubes" with Tim Browning. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wymmCdLdPvM _______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
_______________________________________________ math-fun mailing list math-fun@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/math-fun
-- Thane Plambeck tplambeck@gmail.com http://counterwave.com/