7 Jan
2012
7 Jan
'12
2:28 p.m.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Tom Rokicki <rokicki@gmail.com> wrote:
More likely, I need to write more clearly and with fewer mistakes.
Also I don't think I actually stated the result you have on smallest seed. So no need for any apologies.
If you want to be completely correct, I owe Michael Kleber an apology for repeating something he proved, and I don't have an excuse of his writeup being unclear.
Nah, you were careful enough to get b(b-1) out of it, while I only got b^2-1. I'm watching with interest, though! --Michael -- Forewarned is worth an octopus in the bush.