10 May
2009
10 May
'09
2:36 p.m.
At this point, I aqree with what Gene wrote below. Or at least with the consequences of this kind of thinking: whoever *can* take the other's king first is the winner. --Dan Gene wrote: << I guess I don't see the benefit of an inconsistent set of rules, that one may sometimes place one's King in check, but sometimes not. Perhaps a more sensible modification to the rules would be to always permit moves that put one's own King in check, and then also permit a player to actually capture the opponent's King.
_____________________________________________________________________ "It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that certain je ne sais quoi." --Peter Schickele