7 May
2013
7 May
'13
1:54 p.m.
Yes, exactly. How it evolves as the constant changes from 0 to 2. Which probably doesn't scale well, so it may depend heavily on the choice of foci, which to begin with I'm setting at (-1,0) and (-1,0). Even weirder is the evolution of the locus of distance1^(1/distance2) = constant for the same foci, as constant varies, also from 0 to 2. --Dan On 2013-05-07, at 1:28 AM, Bill Gosper wrote:
You mean distance1^distance2 = constant, right?