On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Mark Reed wrote:
Can we also try suggesting people who actually post using the English langauge and not some bastdisrd form of txt msging. I myself am also frsutrated... by people who are too damn lazy to spell properly or use grammar correctly.
*ROTFLMAO* ;-))) well ... if this message above was meant as a joke , then it's a pretty good one ... as it incl. even more spellin' & grammar mistakes that i could ever make in only one message !!! *still_LOL* ;-))) very interestin' indeed ... as it also comes from a native english speaker , which I'M_NOT_!!! *G+* ;-) but if this message above wasn't meant as a joke & was indeed posted here in all seriousness , then ... [ uhm ... self-censored comment !!! *smirk* :o} ] well ... i better suppose that it was jus' meant as a joke , as this would make me *LOL* again !!! *BWG* ;-))) later on that day mr. lapierre wrote :
I do definitely agree with him about the HTML posts though. HTML belongs on the web ONLY, folks - NOT in email.
honestly folx , i have absolutely NO_PROBLEM with html in e-mail ... as long as it doesn't completely screws up the daily digests of a mailin' list like this !!! :-o
Some mailing lists are set up to automatically filter out HTML tags or simply discard messages that contain non-plaintext.
like i've done it with the kraftwerkfans yahoogroup ( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kraftwerkfans/ ) , which makes their digests much better readable , albeit some people are sometimes too lazy or simply too ignorant & DON'T edit their replies properly , which sadly also screws up the digests then !!! *sigh* :-o
It would be nice if that could be implemented here.
oh yes , it could indeed be implemented here too very easily ... but as we don't have ANYBODY , who really takes care of this list anymore ... this will sadly NEVER happen !!! :-/ however ... many greetinx , oh jay ;-) *~\^/~*