It is possible that Diana’s Mercedes was externally controlled in this way, because it is clear that the steering on Horsley’s BMW was also remotely controlled. Certainly a highly skilled operator could direct the Mercedes into the 13th pillar. Support for the contention that no other car was directly involved in Diana’s crash comes from Eric Petel who claims to have seen the crash. Petel says that he was riding his motorcycle towards the entrance to the tunnel when he was overtaken by the Mercedes. No other vehicle was nearby. He said: “I saw a car in my rear-view mirrors flashing its headlamps. I moved across to let it by and it raced past even though I was doing about 70 miles per hour. An instant later I heard a deafening noise and saw the accident. The car was spinning in the road... I stopped. There were no other cars or bikes around at all and I could see all the way through the tunnel. The roof of the Mercedes was totally smashed in. The right hand rear door was partly open and I looked in and saw a woman. She seemed to have been thrown forward from the back seat and had her head between the front seats.”51 Petel said blood was flowing from her right ear and as he brushed her hair from her face and placed her head on the arm rest, he realised it was Princess Diana. Her eyelashes were fluttering, but she had not opened her eyes at this stage, he said. Petel estimates he was at the scene for about a minute before climbing back on his bike to ring the police. He told them that Diana had been in an accident, but they laughed and told him to stop wasting their time. In despair at this, he rode to the police station in Avenue Mozart. His lawyer, Antoine Deguines, says that Petel was kept waiting for 25 minutes and taken into a backroom where he was handcuffed. For reporting an ‘accident’? When eventually freed, he was told to follow a police car to another police station where he gave a statement which he signed without reading. “I was outraged” he said “They didn’t seem to care about the crash.” He heard nothing from the authorities for months before he enlisted help from a lawyer to tell his story to the official inquiry. Whenever an assassination occurs in a public place, two things happen. The person named as responsible is a ‘patsy’ or ‘scapegoat’, most often these days under mind control, and diversions galore are created to lead investigators away from the truth of what happened. The first method allows you to make an immediate arrest, or expose the person to blame, and no further investigations are necessary because everyone knows who was responsible. We have seen this technique with Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, Timothy McVeigh, and now Henri Paul. It is endless. The second method, the diversion, ensures that the crucial hours and days after the event are wasted as people chase a mass of false stories and ‘leads’ .This was a technique used in Paris with the paparazzi, the•435 flashing lights from motorcycles and later the Fiat Uno. Also when people are fed a constant barrage of conflicting reports and theories they become confused and a confused mind switches off and loses interest. So first they tell you the paparazzi were to blame, then they were not. Then they tell you the car speedometer was found stuck at 120 miles an hour, then they say it was found on zero. I thought it strange how many American witnesses to the crash were quickly located. The Pont and Place de L’Alma were not, before Diana’s death, a popular tourist area. There is nothing there except a restaurant or two, a tunnel, and a maze of crossing roads. And yet at 12.25 in the morning, several American tourists say they witnessed what happened. The number of witnesses in general was unusual anyway, given the late hour and the fact that Paris empties at that time of year as vast numbers of Parisians take their annual holiday to the French coastal resorts. I can understand that some people in the few cars travelling along the road at the time may have seen the crash and its immediate aftermath, but I know from visiting the spot myself, that the main pedestrian routes have virtually no view of the tunnel at all. The police failed to control the crash scene according to normal police procedure and so much evidence was lost immediately. They failed to question important witnesses and leaked some information while maintaining unshakable secrecy over other areas of the investigation.52 It all stinks. Today there is an added challenge for would-be assassins and assassination plots with the ‘traffic’ cameras that are located all over cities. Smile, you’re on TV. It would be impossible to keep secret the methods and personnel used to kill Diana if the whole thing was being videoed. But when you are the Brotherhood with connections at the highest levels in politics, police and intelligence agencies, the traffic cameras present no such problem. You simply switch them off! There are 17 traffic cameras on the route between the Ritz and the Pont de L’Alma, including those inside the tunnel itself. If they had been working that night there would be no mystery, because you could play back the whole event on your television set. One camera looks down on the entrance to the tunnel and would have recorded any Fiat Uno or men on motorbikes with flashing lights. But that camera, like all the others, was switched off at the crucial moment. Never before in Paris had the whole system malfunctioned at the same time and the police refuse to explain what happened. The system runs on an independent power supply and it is controlled by the police and, ultimately, by the French Intelligence agencies, because the cameras are there to monitor far more than just traffic problems. At the same time as the camera system failed all the police communication frequencies in central Paris also went off. Simon Reagan in his excellent book, who Killed Diana?, quotes a contact called Andre’ who, like many people, loves to listen in to police radio messages. Andre’ was sitting on a bench near the Eiffel Tower, a few minutes walk from the Pont de L’Alma, on the night Diana died. He was, as usual, using a receiver to monitor the police communications. But suddenly, at 12.2Oam, all the lines went down. There was a radio blackout. It lasted for 20 minutes and then, Andre’ said, the signal came back and there was a mass of radio traffic as people all wanted to talk at once. “I have never... come across such chaotic radio traffic”, he said. “It was extraordinary.”•436 When the lines went down Diana was leaving the Ritz on her last journey alive. By the time they came back she was lying in the tunnel under the complete control of the emergency team and according to the autopsy report within a few minutes of clinical death. And there is not a shred of credible evidence for a conspiracy, is there, eh? My God, it’s in our face. But within ten days of the crash, the French police had produced a 350 page preliminary report which assumed it was an accident and they did not consider any other possibility. Now, talking of that ‘emergency team’ brings me to another vital point. As a contact on the fringes of British Intelligence told me, causing the crash is easy for the powers involved, but you cannot be sure of killing your target. Therefore you have your people controlling the medical team because, although your target hasn’t died, there is now a credible reason for them to die. There has been a crash. The medical team’s job (or those in charge, anyway) is to make sure that the target does not survive, no matter what condition they may be in to start with. Even those who dismiss the idea that Diana was murdered have questioned the astonishing delay in getting her to hospital when, according to the official medical reports, she was suffering from an injury that required urgent surgery. The doctors say that the pulmonary vein had been ruptured near the heart and this was filling her lungs with blood. Diana was lying in the tunnel bleeding to death, if that is correct. The only way her life was going to be saved with such an injury was through immediate surgery. So why was it more than an hour and a half before she arrived at the hospital? Within a minute of impact, Doctor Frederic Mailliez with an American ‘friend’ Mark Butt, drove into the tunnel from the opposite direction. A private investigator I know has made extensive inquiries into Mailliez and Butt and, while these investigations continue, his findings strongly suggest there is more to both of them than we are being told. The crash happened at 12.25am and by 12.26, Doctor Mailliez said he had seen the crushed Mercedes, stopped his car, turned on warning lights, run across to the Mercedes to establish there were two people dead and two alive and had rung the emergency services. This man must be a seriously quick worker. He is one of 160 Parisian doctors who are on constant call for emergencies in hospitals and private homes as part of a French insurance system, SOS Medecins. He had treated accident victims many times when he was a member of SAMU, the French emergency ambulance service. And yet a doctor on constant call for emergencies says that all he had in his car to help Diana was an oxygen cylinder and mask! Mailliez was in control of Diana and her condition for the crucial 15 to 20 minutes before his former employers, the SAMU emergency team, arrived to take over. He claims that Diana did not say anything to him, but this contradicts his comment to the London Times that “She kept saying how much she hurt as I put a resuscitation mask over her mouth”. Trevor Rees-Jones, the bodyguard, also says he had flashbacks of hearing a female voice calling out in the back of the car: “First it’s a groan. Then Dodi’s name was called... And that can only be Princess Diana’s voice” he told the Daily Mirror.53 How reliable that statement is, however, is open to debate. What does seem to be clear is that Diana was conscious or at least semi-conscious when Mailliez arrived. He told the CNN chat show host, Larry•437 King, that: “She looked pretty fine. At the beginning... from the outside, you know, she looked pretty fine. But inside, you know, the internal injury was already starting... It’s really funny. That’s the only part, where she was sitting, that’s the only part which was still intact.” Mailliez on one hand told a French medical magazine that: “I thought her life could be saved” and yet said another time that “It was hopeless. There was nothing we could do to save her.” He also told King that although Diana is the most photographed woman in the world, and the paparazzi were taking shots of her while he was with her in the tunnel, he had no idea that she was Princess Diana until he saw the news reports the following morning. Excuse me? The pigs are airborne again. When the emergency team arrived, Malliez says he left the scene because there was nothing more he could do. The official explanation for the incredible delay in taking Diana to hospital is that she was trapped in the wreckage. This is a lie, lie, lie. One of the ambulance crew told the French newspaper, La Parisien, that when he arrived Diana was lying with most of her body out of the car with her legs resting on the rear seat. “She was agitated, semi knocked out, but conscious... she was groaning and struggling feebly. She murmured ‘Oh my God’ several times.” The Scotsman newspaper, in an investigation published on September 11th 1997, established that Diana was removed from the car shortly after the fire brigade arrived and the excuse of her being ‘trapped’ does not stand up. Another official excuse for the delay is that the emergency doctors had to give her a blood transfusion. This is another lie, lie, lie. SAMU teams do not carry blood transfusion equipment because they would not know the victim’s blood type. When the ambulance did leave the tunnel, the driver was ordered to go no faster than 25 miles an hour and some reports say it took as long as 40 minutes to cover the 3.7 miles (6km) to the La Pitie-Salpetriere. Four other hospitals quite capable of treating Diana were closer to the scene and the ambulance stopped twice on the way for ‘delicate interventions’, one of them within sight of the hospital. Diana arrived at La Pitie-Salpetriere about 2.lOam, an hour and 45 minutes after the crash happened. By any medical criteria whatsoever this delay was utterly ludicrous, unless it was meant to happen. It doesn’t take a genius to see why, despite such apparent incompetence, there has been no inquiry into the medical response that night. Waiting at the hospital were a surgical team headed by Professor Bruno Riou, the duty surgeon who, we are told, first heard about the crash while doing his rounds. Is it only me that finds it strange that a renowned surgeon is ‘doing his rounds’ in the early hours of the morning? Waiting with him when Diana arrived were Professor Pierre Coriat, the head of anaesthetics, Professor Alain Pavie, a chest and heart specialist, and Professor Pierre Benazet, another experienced surgeon. They had been in telephone communication with the emergency team in the tunnel throughout. We are told they opened Diana’s chest cavity, repaired the vein, and ‘battled to save her’ for an hour and a half before admitting defeat. I find this remarkable, also, because the autopsy report apparently shows that Diana was clinically dead at 12.45am while still lying in the tunnel. She would therefore have been clinically dead for an hour and 25 minutes before she even arrived at the hospital and for three hours before the professors walked out of the operating theatre to announce that she had died. Having the body examined at a location you control is vital in such assassinations. President Kennedy’s body was flown immediately out of Dallas to the Brotherhood-front, the Bethesda Naval Center near Washington DC, for the post mortem. Here the president’s brain went missing (or his look-alike’s did) and, as the US Assassination Records Review Board revealed, the autopsy notes and the first draft of the post mortem were burned. So who was behind Diana’s assassination? It is important to stress that those who gave the order and those who did the deed would be very different. We are looking at a Brotherhood here, a spider’s web, and while the order will have come from the spider or spiders in the centre, it will have been mostly carried out by the flies. It is highly unlikely that it would have been done directly by British Intelligence because that would be too obvious. Intelligence agencies subcontract the assassinations of their own citizens to put them at arms length from the incident and to allow them to ‘plausibly deny’ that they were responsible. For instance, there is considerable evidence that President Kennedy was shot by members of an elite rifle team within a renegade unit of French Intelligence called the OAS, or at least that they were involved in the plot. Olof Palme, the Bilderberger Prime Minister of Sweden, was murdered in Stockholm in 1986 on the orders of, among others, George Bush. But the killing was carried out by members of BOSS, the South African Intelligence agency (see .. And The Truth Shall Set You Free). The British Foreign Office has its own assassination squad called Group 13 (that number again) and British Intelligence has a long and sick history of political and economic assassinations. British Intelligence consists of MIS (Military Intelligence 5) which is responsible officially for domestic security, and M16 which deals with overseas matters. MIS announced in 1988 that they do not assassinate people. No, they get others to do it for them. This pathetic denial was prompted by the revelations of the former MIS agent, David Shayler, that M16 had organised a plot to assassinate Libya’s Colonel Gaddafi. The attempt had failed because the bomb was put under the wrong car. Shayler was head of the ‘Libyan Desk’ at MIS and was in the perfect position to know. Robin Cook, the Foreign Secretary, who is so far out of his depth he needs a frogman’s suit, said that he had been assured that no such event took place. Oh, that’s OK then. The attorney-general banned David Shayler from appearing on the ITV programme, Diana - Secrets of the Crash, and later Shayler was arrested and jailed in Paris awaiting extradition to London. Why do that if what he is saying is such nonsense? Because, of course, he’s right. By the way, the oath of allegiance by British Intelligence officers is not to the government, but to the monarch. It is the same with Members of Parliament and the military. Ultimately the Queen is their boss under the law, although, in truth, their boss is whoever controls the Queen because even she is not at the top of the pile. The type of organisation most likely to have been involved in Diana’s death, at the operational level is typified by the Pinay Circle or ‘Le Cerde’ which has a number of British establishment figures in its ranks. Le Cerde is an offshoot of the even more elite Safari Club, which was set up by Count Alexander de Maranches, the Director during the 1970s of the French Service for External Documentation and Espionage. It was the Safari Club which arranged for the alliance between a French Intelligence front-•439 company called Group Bull and the computer giant Honeywell which is, you will be surprised to know, the world’s biggest manufacturer of landmines. This alliance supplied landmines to both sides in the Bosnian conflict. The Safari Club began as a consortium of the secret police of the Shah of Iran called SAVAK, Saddam Hussein in Iraq, Anwar Sadat of Egypt and Saudi Arabian Intelligence. It has been involved in countless coups in Africa to further its goals and is heavily involved in arms trading and supply. Out of the Safari Club came the Pinay Circle or Le Cerde, named after the French Prime Minister, Antoine Pinay, who attended the first Bilderberg Meeting in Oosterbeek, Holland, in May 1954. Others involved with Le Cerde included the Habsburg family. To give you an idea of its make up and range of influence, the Le Cerde membership has included Nicholas Elliot, a department head at M16; William Colby, a former director of the CIA; Colonel Botta of Swiss Military Intelligence; Stefano Della Chiaie, a leading member of the Italian Secret Service; Giullo Andreotti, the former Italian Prime Minister from the notorious P2 Freemasonry Lodge and the man who gave the Mafia official protection; Silva Munoz, a former minister for the fascist, Franco, in Spain and a member of the Elite secret society, Opus Dei; Franz Josef Strauss, the German defence minister; and Monsignor Brunello, an agent to the Vatican. In America, one of the Le Cerde fronts is the CIA-backed Heritage Foundation in Washington. Look at the potential for such an organisation to be the coordinating force between countless different agencies and countries all to achieve a common aim. The Safari Club-Le Cerde network provides the Arab-British-French connection necessary to arrange for Diana to be in Paris at the right time, the security for her to be withdrawn, the assassination to be carried out, and those involved to get away with it. What was that John Stalker said? “Why would the French want to cover up the murder of a British woman?” It is also interesting that Simon Regan in his book, Who Killed Diana?, says that it was Le Cerde which destablised the Gough Whitlam government in Australia in 1975. The Queen was certainly involved in that, too. As I explained earlier, it was her Governor of Australia, John Kerr, who removed Whitlam in the end. If the Windsors and Le Cerde worked together to bring down an elected Australian Government, why could they not have worked together to eliminate Diana? Paris, with its immense Brotherhood associations going back centuries, has long been a favourite location for their murders and plots. Amschel Rothschild from the English branch of the family, was murdered there in his hotel room in 1996 in what some claim to have been part of one of the inter-Brotherhood wars which have littered their history. For an organisation like Le Cerde, or its many mirrors in London, it would have been easy to place its people in the right places. Mohamed Al Fayed’s security operation is awash with former members of elite British military and police units who know the consequences of saying “No” to the Brotherhood, even if they don’t wish to be involved. In the same way, these spider structures ensure that their people control the inquiries into their assassinations, as they did most famously with Kennedy. Even Mohamed Al Fayed’s personal investigation into Diana’s death was headed by Pierre Ottavoili, a former chief of the Criminal Brigade, the criminal investigation department•440 of French Police. This is the same organisation which is also responsible for the official investigation. Al Fayed’s chief lawyer in Paris is a former French Justice Minister, and in overall charge in London is John Macnamara, his head of security and a former Chief Superintendent at the headquarters of London’s Metropolitan Police, Scotland Yard. In the Spring of 1998, Macnamara was part of a ‘sting’ operation involving the FBI, CIA and possibly, the Israeli (Rothschild) Intelligence Agency Mossad, to arrest a former CIA agent Oswald Le Winter, a 67-year-old American born in Austria. Le Winter contacted Al Fayed claiming to have documents for sale proving the involvement of M16 and the CIA in Diana’s murder. He was asking $10 million and after a meeting with Macnamara he was given an advance of $15,000. A further meeting was arranged in Vienna, Austria, for the key documents and the rest of the money to be handed over. In the meantime, however, Al Fayed called a friend in the FBI, who contacted the CIA. Le Winter was followed, spied on, and lured to the Ambassador Hotel in Vienna on Wednesday April 22nd, where with support from the Austrian police a combination of FBI, CIA and possibly Mossad agents pounced on him. All this for an alleged hoaxer? The story would have remained secret, but for Peter Grolig, an Austrian journalist on the Kurier newspaper. He reported what happened and established that when Le Winter’s hotel room was searched, four documents, two of them in code, were found and appeared to be genuine CIA documents. The CIA have since admitted tapping Diana’s phone calls in, and to, America and passing the contents to British Intelligence. Le Winter was arrested and held in custody. Grolig’s story forced Al Fayed to admit that it was true. So was Le Winter trapped by such an array of international security personnel because he was selling a hoax to Al Fayed or because he was selling the truth? Another intelligence insider also insists the crash was not an accident. Richard Tomlinson, a former agent of Britain’s M16, gave evidence to the French inquiry into Diana’s death. In 1997 Tomlinson served a six month jail sentence under the Official Secrets Act for trying to sell his memoirs. In August 1998 he was arrested again, at gun point, in Paris at the request of the British Government who were concerned at his association in that city with the MIS whistle-blower, David Shayler, who was also arrested and jailed in Paris.54 Tomlinson apparently told Herve Stephan, the judge in charge of the ‘inquiry’, that Diana was murdered. According to a report on the BBC’s news service, Ceefax, on August 28th 1998, he told the judge that Henri Paul was an asset of British Intelligence and so was “One of the bodyguards”. Which one was not named. Meanwhile Herve Stephan, a Brotherhood placeman, is doing all he can to hold the line that it was an accident. The most important question to ask when you are trying to identify those responsible for a crime is: “Who benefits?” As the Roman wnter, Seneca, said: “He who most benefits from a crime is the one most likely to have committed it”. Well the Windsors benefited magnificently. No longer is Diana there to continue her inevitable destruction of the Monarchy’s credibility and public esteem with her actions and her knowledge of their secrets. No longer is she there to bring her influence on the upbringing and attitudes of the future king, Prince William and his brother Prince Harry. The Windsors now have•441 complete control of them, to mould them into their image. They couldn’t do that before because Diana’s influence was too strong and I hope the memory of that will encourage the princes to withstand the indoctrination. The way is now paved for Charles’ marriage to Camilla Parker-Bowles without the complication of Diana and, of course, his royal duty to produce Windsor heirs with Spencer genes, although as we shall see, William might not be his child. Understandably, it has been suggested that Diana was killed because of her campaign against landmines. This is not true, not directly anyway. The landmine manufacturers have done very nicely from her campaign, because they make far more money from clearing mines than they do making them. A mine costs about £30 to produce, but at least £3,000 to clear. Clearing all the mines around the world is estimated at £330 billion. No, the landmine manufacturers like Honeywell were not against Diana’s campaign, they loved it for their own reasons. But what she showed very clearly was the power she had to take an issue from the shadows and hurl it into the public arena. The question could well have been: “What will she do next?”. And what was it that Diana had to reveal, as she told my contact, that would “Shake the world”? Henry Kissinger, one of the greatest Brotherhood manipulators of the 20th century, met Diana a number of times and sickeningly attended her funeral. He said in an interview after her death that: “She was politically and diplomatically uncontrollable”. That is Kissinger-speak for “That’s one reason she was killed”. From the perspective of the operational level of the Brotherhood pyramid, as with Kennedy, there were many reasons why they wanted her dead. But, as I keep emphasising, that is only one level. At the top are the Elite black magic adepts, the reptilian full bloods and crossbreeds. At the highest level of the Brotherhood, Diana’s death, like Kennedy’s, was a ritual killing. It was long planned for the effect it would have on the people and the magnetic field of the Earth, and to symbolise the introduction of the New World Order. Don’t underestimate the fantastic power of ritual and symbolism in affecting the human psyche and the planet’s magnetic field. These people are not obsessed with it for no reason. Also a lot of this info can be confirmed by other sources. If you doubt any of this at least research it. _________________________________________________________________ Worried what your kids see online? Protect them better with MSN 8 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental&pgmarket=en-gb&XAPID=186&DI=1059