Re: getting the facts wrong
moore's "crediblility" on anything is no more credible than ann coultier
leave it to a self-proclaimed republikan to get the facts (and names) wrong if you're speaking about the reactionary tale-teller ann coulter, one thing is for certain: no matter if one's on the right, left, middle or OFF the political spectrum, any honest, sane person recognizes michael moore is CONSIDERABLY more credible than ann coulter
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:13:49AM -0400, our.webstuff@verizon.net wrote:
moore's "crediblility" on anything is no more credible than ann coultier
leave it to a self-proclaimed republikan to get the facts (and names) wrong
if you're speaking about the reactionary tale-teller ann coulter, one thing is for certain:
no matter if one's on the right, left, middle or OFF the political spectrum, any honest, sane person recognizes michael moore is CONSIDERABLY more credible than ann coulter
I consider Coultier the right-wing equivilent of Moore. Me being republican has NOTHING to do with it. BOTH are on the extreme ends of thier political perspective and I don't trust or hold people like that to be credible. -- . \ ` ' / . ._` __^__ '_. Loki Ambridous von Esling [()=()] RELST8 - http://www.relst8.net /_____\ Justified
participants (2)
-
Loki Ambrodious von Esling -
our.webstuff＠verizon.net