Re: [KLF] Just a Question : How old is everyone in this list? And from which Country ?
The "average" KLF List Member is: * 29 years old * Male * Living in the UK (based on "majority rules") Some break downs: % of respondents living in each country: UK 36.54% USA 25.00% Australia 7.69% Germany 7.69% Netherlands 7.69% France 5.77% Canada 1.92% Finland 1.92% New Zealand 1.92% Russia 1.92% Sweden 1.92% Average location on the map is probably somewhere in the Atlantic. Youngest member: 17 Oldest member: 54 And before you all ask.... "Yes, I was bored". O&EE
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:58:22 -0000, thuggy666 wrote:
And before you all ask.... "Yes, I was bored".
hmm Switzerland is missing :-) ok, I'm 24 years old and live in Biel, Switzerland. If you know Rolex, Swatch and Omega watches, this is the place where they are made :-))) I am on the list for some years now, can't even remember. The first time I heard the KLF back in the late 80ies on our national radio, that made me addicted to them (it was an interview with them, sadly I killed the tape by accident later) cu Adrian -- Adrian Gschwend @ OS/2 Netlabs ICQ: 22419590 ktk@netlabs.org ------- The OS/2 OpenSource Project: http://www.netlabs.org
Did you get 52 Replies to your "how old is everybody" ? I thought we were some more on the list. kubi thuggy666 wrote:
The "average" KLF List Member is:
* 29 years old * Male * Living in the UK (based on "majority rules")
Some break downs:
% of respondents living in each country:
UK 36.54% USA 25.00% Australia 7.69% Germany 7.69% Netherlands 7.69% France 5.77% Canada 1.92% Finland 1.92% New Zealand 1.92% Russia 1.92% Sweden 1.92%
Average location on the map is probably somewhere in the Atlantic.
Youngest member: 17 Oldest member: 54
Did you get 52 Replies to your "how old is everybody" ? I thought we were some more on the list.
Well, I didn't actually pose the original question. I was just bored enough to stick all the replies in Excel and muck around with data! But yes, there were 52 entries in the table. Somebody mentioned the other day that there were around 500 people subscribed to the old list, and around 150 had transferred to the new list. Either way, a sample of 50 out of 500 is big enough that statistically things are unlikely to change with more replies now. (Hell, when they sample the population of opinion polls, it works out as being a fraction of 1% being interview some times. TV Ratings is about the same!) Michael
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 12:54:28PM -0000, thuggy666 wrote:
Somebody mentioned the other day that there were around 500 people subscribed to the old list, and around 150 had transferred to the new list. Either way, a sample of 50 out of 500 is big enough that statistically things are unlikely to change with more replies now. (Hell, when they sample the population of opinion polls, it works out as being a fraction of 1% being interview some times. TV Ratings is about the same!)
yeah, tv ratings are based on a tiny sample size, much lower than 1% in the uk i think it's something like 3000 homes, out of several million ~ 0.01% dull trivia jon -- "They didn't know what the symbols and paradoxes meant. Instead of following the finger that points to the moon, they sat down and worshipped the finger itself. Instead of following the map, they thought it was the territory and tried to live in it. Instead of reading the menu they tried to eat it. Dig?" - Miss Portinari
participants (6)
-
Adrian Gschwend -
Alex -
Damian and Caroline Brymora -
Jonathan Wakely -
kubi -
thuggy666