I see your original point, but I don't agree that a printed book isn't that different, but I definately get where you're coming from. They are both essentially works which can be stored. Reading requires the person doing the reading to engage and use his/her own imagination far more than they would when engaging with music. With music it's all handed to you on a plate. When you read your imagination has a far bigger part to play. On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Thomas Touzimsky <tto@klf.de> wrote:
Regarding the point Bill Drummond was trying to make about the death of recorded music. I don't think a printed book is that different, so why isn't print dead from his point of view?
..::// Thomas Touzimsky
"No ice sold after 4 PM, especially 5 cent pieces." - Shop sign in Baltimore
Am 29.09.2010 um 22:50 schrieb Elliott:
This was your original question, where's a point to miss?
How is a printed book different from recorded audio?
..::// Thomas Touzimsky
_______________________________________________ KLF mailing list KLF@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/klf Report list abuse to list-abuse at studio-nibble.com
_______________________________________________ KLF mailing list KLF@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/klf Report list abuse to list-abuse at studio-nibble.com
_______________________________________________ KLF mailing list KLF@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/klf Report list abuse to list-abuse at studio-nibble.com