I imagine it's a bit of a "grey area". I do remember hearing that, although Bill and Jimmy were notoriously liberal with their use of stolen samples, they'd come down like a ton of bricks on people who stole parts of their tracks. Whether this is true or not, I don't know, but I do smile at the irony...
-----Original Message----- From: klf-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:klf-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Loki Ambrodious von Esling Sent: 10 August 2003 18:10 To: klf@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [KLF] an impudence
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 06:04:23PM +0100, Chris Peel wrote:
No. He's *trying* to sell copied stuff for money. If people are prepared to pay ?5 for it then it's up to them to decide
that. He's
certainly not misrepresenting what is actually being sold. Haven't people on this list put together compilations on CDR, and sold them on eBay as such?
I was going to post something about copyrighted material being sold like this, but isn't all of the JAMs' material supposed to be "anti-copyright" or considered public domain? In which case, selling of said materials in that respected format would be justifiable. (If all said mp3s were ripped from JAMS/KLF Communications releases.)
-- . \ ` ' / . ._` __^__ '_. Loki Ambridous von Esling [()=()] RELST8 - http://www.relst8.net /_____\ Justified
_______________________________________________ KLF mailing list KLF@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-> bin/mailman/listinfo/klf