The last load of bootlegs were pretty good. I only noticed the printing errors when comparing them to originals... I don't usually check for spelling mistakes, etc when buying records. But now we know what to look for! I suspect the boots weren't made by a fan as such, probably by an organised group of bootleggers who saw the high prices originals go for and made a stack of them quickly to make a quick stack of money! (money that wouldn't be burnt, probably funded other organised crime...) Chris --- tim DENTON <tim-jan@home9999.fsnet.co.uk> wrote: > I suppose you might leave something perhaps a small
error to show that it was yours but nothing that obvious, I have a boot 1987 and it is blatantly obvious that it is a boot. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Doe" <jondoe@clsmweb.fsnet.co.uk>
Here's a good question.... If you did a bootleg of 1987, would you really go to all the trouble of re-doing the cover and then get the tiny details wrong like the re-issue of 1987 that appeared before?
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com