So in the spirit of keeping it a list only, small scale endeavour, i thought we'd be better off if it was something run by ourselves, rather that something large like archive.org So i've set up an ftp server for us to use. Currently, there's a web interface running for it: http://liberationloophole.co.uk:8000/ username: klf password: klf Am still ironing out the problems, hence why it's web interface only at the moment, the direct ftp interface isn't working just yet. And i threw together the graphics a bit quickly, so apologies it all looks a bit rough. but feel free to use it. I'll spend the rest of the week going through the links everyone has sent and putting the files up on there. On 31 Aug 2011, at 18:19, Ross Jarvis wrote:
OK, I’m famous for incorrectly interpreting things, so perhaps I should recap on what I think I understand from this:
Jimmy told me that when he and Bill decided that they wanted to delete their back catalogue they intended that it would respectfully remain just so. They are not opposed to low key copyright infringement / bootlegs etc between fans and friends but a large scale or commercial release of their previously deleted material would not be acceptable.
If we keep this archive a list only FTP password protected resource, or something similar, it would, presumably, qualify as: Non commercial, small scale and amongst fans and friends. AFAIK the list holds somewhere close to around 500 members.
So would this be acceptable? Bearing in mind I have presumed and I nearly always get the wrong end of the stick. Any way of getting input from the men at the top?
Ross
_______________________________________________ KLF mailing list KLF@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/klf Report list abuse to list-abuse at studio-nibble.com