It's not being close minded or ignorant at all. For example, when I grab a Coke, I want to drink a Coke. I don't want to open it up and find someone has switched it with Sprite, Apple Juice, or Vodka.
I think you're being somewhat disingenuous, but in any event that is an incorrect analogy that is a completely different situation than any previously discussed - at no time, do I remember, someone saying that, for example (to use mccartney again) they had gone to a concert, and INSTEAD of singing, had endured a 2 or 3 hour lecture THAT is the definition of a "bait and switch" and in no case has anyone claimed this happened to them what people seem to be complaing about is more like (to alter your incorrect analogy) buying a coke, drinking it, and then noticing on the label that it's now enriched with vitamin C it's NOT a "bait and switch" because you GOT the coke, and you GOT the concert - you just got something IN ADDITION to what you paid for and in any event the choice is up to you - now that you KNOW what's to be included you can take it or leave it in the future or lobby to change it, but why someone would complain about getting something free is beyond me :) is refusing free things a republikan thing?
You are also just assuming no one is as "well informed" as you are.
I'm not assuming anything - it's kind of like what I was saying before: artists don't know exactly which persons in their audience need the lecture - presumably, the ones that don't need it shouldn't mind hearing it again, out of recognition that the word needs to get around (and if one doesn't want to be lectured like a child, one should stop acting like one)