Here's a good question.... If you did a bootleg of 1987, would you really go to all the trouble of re-doing the cover and then get the tiny details wrong like the re-issue of 1987 that appeared before? ----- Original Message ----- From: "seeklektek" <eclectics@comcast.net> To: "All bound for Mu-Mu Land." <klf@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 8:11 PM Subject: Re: [KLF] "re-issued by public demand" = bootlegs?
Just noticed these two on a forthcoming list from an online retailer:
$19 KLF: 1987 - What the F**K's Going On? LP (JAMS 001LP). "Re-issued by public demand. KLF's first album which was withdrawn due to legal problems due to the uncleared Abba samples."
$19 KLF: Chill Out LP (KLF 005LP). "Re-issued on vinyl by public demand. Yes it's back again for another limited run, Cauty and Drummond's 1990 classic, addictive, spacy ambient album with that unique KLF style."
These are both boots, correct?
seek
_______________________________________________ KLF mailing list KLF@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/klf