* say.map@ihug.co.nz [ Date: 2005-11-27 ] [ w.r.t. Re: [KLF] A KLF Wiki? T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 ]
I was just about to say exactly the same thing except that rather than be one of the people who was trying to introduce disinformation, I'd be one of the people trying to ensure none got in there! There is the option of restricting edits to registered members only and banning any registered users who introduce anything deliberately untrue.
That's *hardly* the spirit I've come to expect from a KLF list member :)
Having a page (or two, or five) on *a* wiki is not the same as having a KLF wiki. I doubt the wikipedia editors would leave a RitesOfMu page there, rather than just subsuming it into the main KLF page, for example.
That said, I don't think a KLF wiki is a good idea. It'd be full of misinformation and lies put there by pranksters who think it's funny to confuse the issues and mislead people (i.e. me)