9-11 was an event that was, I think, so extraordinarily pervasive in its "domino effect". Unfortunate phrase I know, but just think: it's highly unlikely that those jet plane hi-jackers knew that crashing into the Towers at 80 floors or above would inevitably cause the metal superstructure to melt, because of super-heated aviation fuel, and eventually two of the world's biggest buildings would simply dissappear (I don't think anyone EVER suspected this could possibly
Challenge the accepted reality. the official version of 9/11 sounds incredibly improable to me. Antone remember the spanish Skyscraper fire in February? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4271415.stm - and still it didn't collapse. http://www.911truth.org/ http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/9-11_wtc_videos.html http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cutter.html http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html etc etc. No Government is above False Flag ops (recently released papers indicate that the US was seriously considering a self-inflicted strike to justify a Cuban Invasion). Call me a tinfoil hatted nutter if you want but I don't wear hats. "Many will nod their head, OK, that does it and go back to watching the NBA finals or whatever, but I find this theory just about as satisfying as the fantastic conspiracy theory that "19 young Arabs acting at the behest of Islamist extremists headquartered in distant Afghanistan" caused 9/11." - Morgan Reynolds.