Nuclear tri-grams in the I Ching and Base 64 encoding in Fractint.
########################################################
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 22:07:56 -0300 From: "David Fisher" <sunfish@intercom.net>
Subject: [Fractint] Binary system To: "Fractint and General Fractals Discussion" <fractint@mailman.xmission.com> Cc: philofractal@lists.fractalus.com
If anyone is interested check out the nuclear tri-gram designations in the I Ching. Some are also used on the S Korean flag. They are a base 2 system to 64 places...from 0 to 63. Zero being - - used as a placeholder and --- used to designate value. Count from the bottom up with the bottom place being 1, next 2, next 4, next 8, next 16, and top 32. These markings are ancient, but they could very well be used to program gates for a base 64 system since gates are either on or off, 0 or 1. Comments???
David M Fisher sunfish@intercom.net
Comment: Fractint already uses a base 64 encoding for the color map that it saves in parameter files. It uses both upper and lower case letters, digits, and "`" and "_". Here is an example from one of Jim Muth's FoTD postings: colors=000OxzOxzKxzGxzDwz9vz5uz2tz4sz5rz7qz8pzAozB\ nzDmzElzGkzHjzKizMhzPgzRfzTezWcyYax`_wbYvdWugVtiUs\ lTtnSspRrRUZTWXVYWX_VZ`U`bTbdSdfRegQgdRibSk_TlYUnW\ VpTWrRXsPYuMZwK_xI`pLYiNVbQSVSPOVMHXJSg6ak3vSRpUNj\ WJeXFB87LJ78mO5ZG2K8BsxiyxUfcFOKurzfejTUVEIF6FC4C8\ 294ckzKRVhoaU_PFLCDX3jmnNSPvzM2YE1RA1K70D3ykoi`bVR\ QFGDzkvj`gVRTFGEp78Q64jBW7VhKqFDaA6M5Etk7VO4zD3o92\ `61L3MAeG9VB8L57A6xh3XMVoGteaaUPJICa`SPQICG927z16V\ vZiTKN5Wp3NZ1EHNp2WJoLEYAAH6zd3ZKqzJ883672471260uP\ OaIGJC8DEI6A99S3ef2VX1LO1AF06wcVz6Ki4AQ22e7U`sMTeF\ LS7DEg9lX8_M7OB6CZI3QF2HC189058s27S8iEXeXGOGkNzOEV\ ggYTVMEIBf`mLLPvV_gORTIIEC9eJ6SE4EA2WWLwCjCtt9ge6V\ S3IEI`CCQ86G4nq6PU32v91W4uEB_y7ozUbpMQ`FDL7`SFRMBI\ H79B3MlBEY77K3hU8UM5FE2AVO5ICBYs7O`3FInj5PQ2_9GB8O\ 87I57C266kztWgaGPJzzrjmdVZRFKDzzijkYVYNFKBLh0yYTS9\ jI8V97FEpFAdB7T73H3ZVBNM7 } My spell checker doesn't like base 64 encoding! ;-) ----------------------------------------------------
These markings are ancient, but they could very well be used to program gates for a base 64 system since gates are either on or off, 0 or 1.
It seems to me that binary encoding is the most direct way to map numerical digits onto a two- valued electronic gate system. How one conveniently *views* these binary digits is quite another matter. For a long time (in the DEC PDP-11 world at least) binary numbers were printed in octal to (save space? and paper?) and enhance understanding over printing the binary number. Mainframe systems seemed to like to encode binary numbers in hex, which took a little getting used to, but many people are comfortable using this now. We even have a new phrase in the language now -- "hex dump." Its very convenient that two hex digits exactly encode one byte, the smallest addressable memory unit on most machines. But I would think that having to remember the significance of 22 or 54 letters (case would be important) for base 32 or 64 (instead of just A-F for hex) would be an almost insurmountable challenge. - Hal Lane ######################### # hallane@earthlink.net # ######################### ###################################################### -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.2/441 - Release Date: 9/7/06
participants (1)
-
Hal Lane