Re: [Fractint] <Jim>The new rating scale creates an ongoing confusion...

Hal Lane wrote that Jim's conversion should be written. In other words, Jim probably never wrote a fractal with a rating between one and four, so Jim thot he needed more bandwidth on the scale. It never occurred to Jim that it would mean subtracting four from whatever score he was inclined to give it in the first place. That would be like saying "To hell with sales: I want more resolution on my rating system." So, Jim, my recommendation for you is essentially to keep with the old rating, because you probably did not change it, anyway. Maybe you could say that it's on a scale of one to fifteen, where you trash fractals with ratings lower than five.