Richard wrote:
In article <0F9524012BC740DD85E57D6E5A246DF4@terabyte.com>, "Jay Litwyn" <brewhaha@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca> writes:
It turns out that running fractint in different directories does not solve the problem of cross-talk between concurrent copies of fractint, either. I did not examine my test on running fractint in different directories very thoroughly.
If you use the beta5 you won't have this problem.
Okay, so you are Windows 7 friendly. Where are your release notes, summarizing your changes? Are you back-porting anything into the code you are using? Are you working more with code from WinFract, Xfractint, or DOS fractint? I like being able to record things (under DosBOX). Often, Teseral renderings are identical to single-pass output. Teseral renderings offer an excellent compromise on speed and quality. Did you manage to use it? Did you include sound capabilities (OPL)? I can upgrade this thing to four gigabytes of RAM. Does that mean I could do a gigapixel (think outdoor sign) without batch files using beta5?