sam ende wrote:
On Thursday 01 February 2007 03:12, jackoftradez@comcast.net wrote:
It does not seem possible to zoom-in to the buddhabrot in the usual way, which makes sense if you think about what's going on. That sucks, and like most things that suck ain't much I can do about it. However, varying the parameter and iteration count yields an interesting morphing evolution effect:
it's very cool, i love the way you've put it to music too, simply great, thanks for sharing :)
just how do you make these animations ? i use xfractint and often think i'm the only one in the world who does. it seems to be far more limited than fractint too, many of the functions and keystrokes don't work,
I use XFractint, too. I also wish it matched Fractint's capabilities. It does run faster for me than DOS Fractint did, though. I may be weird, but I like the separation between the command screen and the fractal image ... I'm not real big on color cycling, but I'd think XFractint would be able to accommodate 24-bit color support much more easily than Fractint because it doesn't have the same memory limitations as Fractint.
and while i do have fractint also installed on my windows partition, it doesn't work with the wine emulator.
Try Qemu with a FreeDOS disk image - I've been told that Fractint runs just fine (although a bit slower) that way. http://www.qemu.org/ -- David gnome@hawaii.rr.com authenticity, honesty, community