Hi Judith, What you say below is correct. Our routine processing does not include controlling 653 fields, unless that has been specifically requested by the library. In this case, I can confirm that our system is ignoring your 653 fields, thereby escaping them during processing. If you do notice anything askew with our processing of your family record collections, in other fields for instance, please let us know and we will work with you to make sure it is behaving as you would prefer. Nate Cothran Backstage Library Works From: bslwac-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:bslwac-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Judith A Kirk Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 6:25 AM To: Backstage Library Works Authority Contol Listserv Subject: Re: [BSLWAC] DACS Headings So I am also assuming...correct me if I'm wrong... We have some regional history records that use family names that we want to retain. Some of these are 4XX variants on established heading records, but it's the family's name and we need to retain it as it appears. Some of these headings have been entered in 653 fields. I don't believe we profiled BSLW to change 653 fields, so if that's accurate, -any- heading we have put in a 653 field would "escape" BSLW processing? Trying to determine what options we have for these kinds of headings.... we have a lot of family record collections in our catalog and a number of people preparing MARC records, so we want to be sure we keep training them to tag these in ways that won't cause weeping and gnashing of teeth later. Judith Kirk Coordinator, Authority Control Western Michigan University Libraries Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5353 ________________________________ From: "Nate Cothran" <nate@bslw.com> To: bslwac@mailman.xmission.com Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 3:14:40 PM Subject: [BSLWAC] DACS Headings There has been some back and forth on OCLC-CAT recently with respect to DACS headings and authority control processing. DACS stands for Describing Archives: A Content Standard. These are a set of rules for describing archival materials designed to extend the rules in AACR2. An issue develops with family names, which are not allowed as creators (100 or 700) by LC standards, and can only be used as subject headings (6XX). What is happening is that the DACS rules allow more specific forms of a name to be used as an author heading, but are being flipped to the “official” LC form because it matches on one of the 4XX xrefs in the LC authority record. While RDA also allows family names in author (creator) fields, we have decided to address these DACS records only at this time. If your record contains 040 $e dacs your authority control processing will ignore the 1XX and 7XX headings within those records. It will also ignore the specific 6XX subject headings that have $2 dacs. Other “non-DACS” subject headings (6XX) will be controlled in the manner you have set up through your online profile. Of course, if you would prefer that we treat these records differently than we have stated above, please just let your project managers (Judy Archer <mailto:jarcher@bslw.com?subject=DACS%20Heading%20Processing%20Request> , Jeremy Myntti <mailto:jmyntti@bslw.com?subject=DACS%20Heading%20Processing%20Request> ) know and we will work with you to match our processing to your expectations. Nate Cothran - nate@bslw.com <mailto:nate@bslw.com?subject=Automation%20Services%20-%20Query> Product Manager, Automation Backstage Library Works 533 E 1860 S, Provo UT 84606 (p) 801.342.5697 - (f) 801.356.8220 www.ac.bslw.com/community/blog <http://ac.bslw.com/community/blog/> _______________________________________________ BSLWAC mailing list BSLWAC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bslwac