[KLF] Why the "Illuminati"?3

[Simon House]

“It’s a new car that’s come into the system. They wouldn’t have had time to 
check that car out. It should have been checked out. There could have been a 
bomb on the car, for instance. It was a most stupid plan. It shouldn’t even 
have been considered. The back up vehicle is there, not just to avert the 
paparazzi, but for instance, a motor cyclist with a pillion rider to pull up 
and shoot, or put a magnetised bomb on top of the car. That’s why the back 
up car is there - to stop any of that. Why they never had a back up car, God 
only knows. (I think I can offer a good guess without the need for Divine 
inspiration.) “I had probably six or eight men I would consider professional 
bodyguards who I would have had on that job and Trevor Rees-Jones and Kes 
Wingfield, after what I have seen happened, would not have been in Paris 
that night.”
The Mercedes with Henry Paul at the wheel sped off from the rear entrance of 
the Ritz at 12.20am with Paul telling the paparazzi not to bother following 
because they would never catch him. Diana and Dodi were in the back seat and 
in the front was Trevor Rees-Jones, the former ‘Para’ with the reputation 
for being ‘fearless’. Rees-Jones says he disagreed with the change of plan. 
He was not wearing a seat belt which is normal practice because body guards 
need to be free to react quickly. The car was driven at speed down the Rue 
Cambon and turned right down the Rue de Rivoli into the Place de la Concorde 
where it stopped briefly at the lights. The paparazzi photographer, Romuald 
Rat, on the back of a motor cycle, drew up alongside them here, but he says 
that Henri Paul jumped the lights on red and headed onto the dual 
carriageway alongside the River Seine called the Cours la Reine. The car 
plunged down into one tunnel, came back to the surface, and almost 
immediately went down into the very short tunnel at the Pont de UAlma. Here 
it went out of control and struck the 13th pillar in the centre of the 
tunnel which is lined with concrete pillars unprotected by crash barriers. 
Henri Paul and Dodi Fayed died immediately According to the autopsy report 
Diana was clinically dead within 20 minutes and this was long before she 
arrived at hospital. Trevor Rees-Jones survived the crash because he was 
wearing a seat belt and Diana and Dodi were not. This could be highly 
significant. Rees-Jones was not wearing a belt when they left the Ritz in 
accordance with normal practice for body guards, and when Romuald Rat took a 
photograph at the lights at the Place de la Concorde, Rees-Jones still did 
not have a seat belt on. But little more than a minute later when the car 
struck the pillar, he was wearing a seat belt. Why? If he donned the belt 
because for some reason he sensed danger, why did he not scream at Diana and 
Dodi to put their seat belts on? After all it only takes a second and the 
whole reason he was in the car was to protect them. Rees-Jones has some 
serious questions to answer here and he is giving no answers. Some 
bodyguards do put a seat belt on when the car is on a fast road, but 
Rees-Jones is not saying this. He says he doesn’t know why he strapped 
himself in. And if they were going to Dodi’s flat, they would have been on 
the fast road for about a minute. All he says is that he remembers they were 
followed by two cars, one of them white, and a motorcycle, which is in 
keeping with the smokescreen story. But one simple fact about the crash has 
been missed by all the newspaper articles, magazine features, television 
documentaries and discussions I have seen, and by all but a few researchers. 
Everyone is agreed that the couple were being driven back to Dodi’s flat 
near the Arc de Triomphe when the crash happened. Well there is one glaring 
problem with that: The Pont de L’Alma tunnel is not on the way to Dodi’s 
flat. It takes you away from that area.
I have been to Paris and walked the route the car took that night, in fact I 
have walked extensively around that whole area, and the route to Dodi’s 
apartment is the same as the one they took earlier that night. You go to the 
Place de la Concorde and, half way around, you turn right into the Champs 
Elysees and drive straight up to Dodi’s flat on the right near the Arc de 
Triomphe (see Figure 53 overleaf). At that time of night it would take only 
a few minutes. But Henri Paul did not do that. He drove past the turning for 
the Champs Elysees, jumped the lights on red and sped down the duel 
carriageway to the Pont de L’Alma. This took them AWAY from Dodi’s flat. I 
have heard it said that Paul was going a long way round to avoid the 
photographers and traffic, but the photographers would have been waiting at 
the flat anyway by the time they got there. What is most important to stress 
here is that Henri Paul’s route was not the direct one to Dodi’s apartment, 
but it did ensure that it took them through the Pont de UAlma Tunnel, the 
significance of which is fantastic, as you will soon appreciate. 
Interestingly, it was after Paul went past the turning to Les Champs Elysees 
and headed towards the Pont de L’Alma that Rees-Jones put his seat belt on. 
He says he can’t remember why, but I can help him there. There can only be 
two reasons for this. Either he knew what was coming or he realised when 
Henri Paul screamed off from the lights that something was seriously wrong 
and he put the seat belt on to protect himself. But again if that is the 
case, why did he not tell Dodi and Diana to do the same? And if Rees-Jones 
had realised a potential danger, why had Dodi and Diana not seen it and 
taken the appropriate action to protect themselves? I’m sorry if that upsets 
Rees-Jones’ family, but given the circumstances these are questions that 
need to be asked.
Once the deed was done; the scapegoat was produced. The methods are so 
predictable, but they keep working so why change them? The Lee Harvey 
Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan and James Earl Ray of the Diana assassination was the 
driver, Henri Paul. Once the paparazzi card had been played and focused 
public and media attention in the days after the crash, it was announced 
that Paul was three to four times over the French drink driving limit and 
that his blood contained traces of anti-depressant drugs, including 
Fluoxetine, the active ingredient of the infamous Prozac. “The cause of the 
crash was simple,” we were told. “The driver was drunk.”
Tampering with blood samples or creating alcohol in the blood is child’s 
play and so is the insertion of tiny ‘balloons’ which release alcohol into 
the blood stream in stages. There was certainly no sign before he drove away 
from the Ritz that he was intoxicated to the extent, according to his blood 
tests, that he must have drunk the equivalent of eight Scotches on an empty 
stomach. A behavioural psychologist on the Independent Television 
documentary, Diana - Secrets Of The Crash, could find no evidence that he 
was drunk after studying the Ritz videos of him that night, but there could 
be an explanation for this which I will come to shortly. Only two days 
earlier, Paul had undergone a rigorous medical for the renewal of his 
pilot’s licence and there was no sign of the alcohol abuse the post-crash 
propaganda claimed. Quite the opposite. And there was another strange 
anomaly revealed by the ITV documentary in 1998. The Haemoglobin in Henri 
Paul’s blood was found to contain 20.7% carbon monoxide and this would have 
been at a much higher level earlier because the carbon monoxide content 
halves every four to five hours once exposure to it has stopped. Haemoglobin 
carries the oxygen. Debbie Davis of the Carbon Monoxide Support Group said 
that with these levels in his blood, Henri Paul would not have known his 
left hand from his right, because of the reduced oxygen reaching the brain. 
Dr Alastair Hay, an expert on carbon monoxide poisoning, agreed and could 
not explain why Paul showed no signs of the considerable symptoms that 
should have been evident:
“I find it difficult to rational ise everything. A blood-carbon monoxide 
level of 20% and (a high blood-alcohol level) suggests this would be someone 
with a much slower reaction time, certainly be someone who would be slowed 
up in the way he did things, would probably also be somebody who was in some 
pain, but none of those things appear to be evident from the pictures that 
we see of him. It is a bit of an enigma.”47
There is a lot more to know about Henri Paul. His best friend, Claude 
Garrec, told the ITV documentary that Paul had contacts within the French 
and foreign intelligence services and maintained them throughout his time at 
the Ritz. This is no surprise because the intelligence agencies recruit the 
security men at the top hotels and the Ritz, with its VIP clientele and 
reputation for espionage and arms dealing, would have been a prime target. 
Paul certainly had unexplained sources of income. He earned about £20- 
25,000 a year at the Ritz and yet he was a keen pilot with 605 hours of 
flying time at about £300 an hour. He had a string of bank accounts. There 
were two in a bank outside Paris and three accounts, plus a safe deposit 
box, at the Banque Nationale de Paris near the Ritz. He had three accounts 
at the nearby branch of Barclays and one current and four deposit accounts 
at the Caisse D’Epargne de Paris. In the eight months before the crash, sums 
of £4,000 were paid into an account here on five separate occasions. In 
total he had £122,000 (1.2 million francs) and no-one knows where it came 
from. Then there is the question of where Paul was in the three hours 
between 7pm when he went off duty and 10pm when Dodi called him on his 
mobile phone and told him to return to the Ritz. His whereabouts in this 
period are a mystery. A very significant one.
To understand how the Brotherhood operates requires immensely detailed 
research over a vast array of interconnecting subjects. Everything from 
ancient history, to Satanic symbolism and ritual, the Earth’s magnetic grid, 
the power of the Sun, the banking system, and mind control. The journalists 
who have produced the articles and documentaries about the crash came to the 
subject cold and they can never uncover the truth because they don’t 
understand what they are dealing with. Their vision of possibility is 
limited by their indoctrinated view of reality. They can’t see, for 
instance, that there are organisations within organisations which means that 
one force can work through apparently unconnected agencies like British and 
French Intelligence, the Paris police and medical services, and the inquiry 
investigating the cause of the crash. I mean, you don’t have to search far 
for evidence of that. Look at the Kennedy assassination for one. It is this 
lack of research of the big picture that leads reporters like Martyn Gregory 
on the Dispatches programme to state categorically that “there is not a 
shred of credible evidence to support the conspiracy theory” and that the 
suggestion of Prince Philip’s involvement was “ludicrous”. I wonder after 
reading the evidence which you think is more ludicrous: the idea of a plot 
to kill Diana or Martyn Gregory’s statement? It was an unfortunate comment 
in a programme that produced some good information about Al Fayed. Then 
there was the ‘investigation’ into the crash by John Stalker, the former 
deputy chief constable of Greater Manchester, in the News Of The World 
newspaper, in which he dismissed all idea that Diana was murdered. 
Ironically, Stalker claimed, quite rightly, that he was the victim of a 
conspiracy to remove him from the police force after he identified a policy 
by the Northern Ireland police, the RUC, to shoot people they believed were 
terrorists and ask the questions later. This was the so-called shoot-to-kill 
policy. Pushing aside every suggestion of a conspiracy to kill Diana, 
Stalker asked: “Why would the French want to cover up the murder of an 
English woman?”48 The naivety of that statement is so breathtaking, I need a 
glass of water. At the same time, Stalker did ask some pertinent questions 
about the crash and its aftermath: “Why was the Fayed security around the 
princess reduced to one wholly inadequate man with no back up? Why did the 
police not appeal for help from the public? Why was there no post 
mortem-autopsy on Dodi Fayed’s body?” Answers: because of the very 
conspiracy you dismiss, Mr Stalker.
One of the most important subjects to research if we are to understand how 
Diana was killed, is the power and potential of mind control. I’ll give some 
examples. In the 1980s the best part of 30 scientists working in top secret 
projects, mostly computer programmers, died in very strange and unexplained 
circumstances. Marconi was the major company involved, but there were others 
like Plessey and British Aerospace. In 1986, Vimal Dajibhai, who was working 
for Marconi Underwater Systems, drove from London to Bristol, a city with 
which he had no connection, and threw himself off the famous suspension 
bridge there. A few months before, Arshad Sharif, a computer programmer with 
Marconi Defence Systems, also drove from London to Bristol and hanged 
himself. Why Bristol? It is a former Knights Templar port and its name has 
evolved from Barati, the Phoenician goddess. It just so happens that an 
elite unit of British Intelligence called the Committee of 26 is based there 
and they use the runway at the British Aerospace complex to fly British and 
foreign agents in and out of the country. I was called once, from what 
sounded like a plane, by a guy claiming to represent the CIA. He said he was 
flying into the British Aerospace runway to sort me out. “The Company (CIA) 
are not happy,” he said. Oh, I thought, I am sorry, I do hope they cheer up 
soon. I drove over to meet him just to check it out, but he didn’t show. He 
was probably a guy who needed help, or perhaps they were seeing how I would 
react to threats. Either way, they got the airport right. In that period in 
the 1980s, not only in Bristol, there were strange deaths galore of people 
at the cutting edge of development in the ‘defence’ industries.
What possesses a man to get into his car, drive more than two hours to the 
Bristol Suspension Bridge, and jump off? This may seem a long way from the 
Diana assassination, but it’s not. I’m talking about mind control. A CIA 
scientist told me that he was put through forms of mind control to stop him 
recalling his knowledge once a project was completed. I’ll give you an 
example of mind control in a situation very similar to the one in Paris. 
David Sands was a highly skilled scientist working in a very sensitive area 
of defence, but at 37 he was talking about leaving the industry and changing 
his lifestyle. He was happily married with two small children, a son aged 
six and a three year old daughter. Sands and his wife had just returned from 
an enjoyable holiday in Venice when he died in mysterious circumstances. 
Although they are not so mysterious if you understand mind control. He 
worked for Easams who, in turn, were operating contracts for the Ministry of 
Defence. It appears that while Sands and his wife were in Venice, the 
company was visited by members of the elite British police unit, the Special 
Branch. Then, on Saturday, March 28th 1987, David Sands told his wife he was 
going out to refuel the car, but he didn’t return for six hours. No-one has 
any idea where he was, but I think I do. His wife, Anna, called the police 
and constable John Hiscock was at the house when Sands returned at 10.2Opm. 
Asked the obvious question: “Where have you been?”, he said that he had been 
driving and thinking. His wife said that it was out of character for him to 
be away for so long and she didn’t think he realised how long he had been 
out. He seemed confused, but happy, she said. Two days later, on Monday, 
March 30th, he climbed into his excellently maintained Austin Maestro and 
began his regular journey from his home in Itchen Abbas, near Winchester, to 
Easams at Camberley in Surrey. His wife said there was nothing unusual about 
his demeanour or behaviour and driving conditions were good. But about 30 
minutes into the journey when David Sands was driving along the A33 at 
Popham, near Basingstoke, he suddenly did a U-turn across the duel 
carriageway and headed at high speed in the opposite direction to his 
destination. Turning onto a slip road at about 80 miles an hour, Sands then 
drove his car straight into a disused cafe building killing himself in an 
explosion of flame. There were no skid marks. He had not even tried to 
stop.49 It is so clear that during the time he was missing, his mind was 
being programmed and all it took was a trigger word, sign, sound or action, 
and the programming was activated. At that point he would have switched from 
his normal self to a man focused only on driving into the cafe building and 
blowing himself away. The subconscious programming overpowers the conscious 
mind and robot replaces human.
That, I am convinced, is what also happened to Henri Paul in Paris. Sands 
went missing for six hours before he drove into the cafe. Paul went missing 
for three hours before he drove into the 13th pillar in the Pont de UAlma 
tunnel. This is what I suggest happened in Paris. The Brotherhood networks 
were working through many people and agencies to ensure that Diana was in 
Paris that night because, at its foundation, the plan was to perform a 
specific Satanic ritual and the timing, circumstances and the place of death 
had to be arranged in intricate detail. Diana was under Al Fayed’s security 
web for much of the time leading up to the crash and all of the time in 
those last few days. Her conversations were heard and monitored throughout 
by the Al Fayed bugging system. During his missing hours, Henri Paul,•432 
the asset of French and British Intelligence, was being programmed for his 
role, or perhaps the final touches were being put to programming already 
installed. Diana’s ritual death was arranged from the very top of the 
Brotherhood and, by comparison, people like Al Fayed are small and powerless 
nonentities, pawns in the game they probably do not fully understand. The 
Mercedes which was brought to the rear entrance of the Ritz had been stolen 
some weeks earlier - before the Diana-Dodi relationship began - and when it 
was recovered it underwent extensive repairs. It had been standing outside 
the exclusive Taillevent restaurant when the driver’s door was flung open 
and the chauffeur pulled out by three Arabic-speaking men with hand guns. 
The vehicle was missing for two weeks and when it was found the wheels were 
missing, the door ripped off, and the electronic system and equipment 
controlling the braking system had gone. Al Fayed, as we have seen, 
controlled the company, Etoile Limousines, which supplied the vehicle. No 
wonder the French authorities turned down the offer by experts from Mercedes 
to examine the car after the crash.
When Henri Paul came back on duty that night he seemed his normal self to 
most observers. The programming was deep within his psyche still waiting to 
be activated. He may well have had a couple of alcoholic drinks in the Ritz 
bar, but his intake and demeanour did not correspond with the later medical 
report. Claims that he was an alcoholic also do not match with the 
examination of his liver. But if, as I suggest, Henri Paul was a mind 
controlled ‘multiple’ he could have been drunk in one compartment of his 
mind and not in another. I have heard from recovering ‘multiples’ who have 
experienced this. Someone close to Paul that night, his handler, was 
switching his compartments. In this way he could have had a considerable 
level of alcohol in his blood while, in some compartments, he would have 
been unaffected by it. The same with the carbon monoxide. Just before or 
just after the Mercedes pulled away from the Ritz, Henri Paul was given the 
trigger which activated the programming. It could have been a sound, a sign, 
a colour or more likely a word or sentence. With Paul’s subconscious 
programming now overwhelming his conscious mind, he sped away to the Place 
de la Concorde and down the dual carriageway to the Pont de UAlma. 
Rees-Jones put his seat belt on, but apparently did not alert Diana and Dodi 
to the danger. Thus they stay unbelted. As Paul entered the Pont d L’Alma 
tunnel at an estimated 80 miles an hour (some reports say slower), he braked 
fiercely, scraped the right hand wall of the tunnel, and then aimed the car 
at the 13th pillar. It is the 13th pillar that gives it away. The 
Brotherhood throughout history has had such an obsession with the number 13 
that to believe this was a coincidence is taking chance to the level of 
fantasy. There must be 30 pillars in that tunnel and the car hit the 13th 
because it was meant to. Diana had an aversion to the number 13 and she 
would not allow a 13th lot in her dress auction at Christies the June before 
she died. If, as some witnesses have suggested, the crash was caused by the 
Mercedes hitting a white Fiat Uno or by a motorcyclist flashing a powerful 
light into Paul’s eyes from a motor cycle, there is no way he could be sure 
of hitting the 13th pillar. But a person with a deeply programmed 
subconscious would be able to put the car right on the button, even at 
speed.•433
Mark Phillips is the man who helped to deprogramme Cathy O’Brien when she 
was a mind controlled slave of the CIA. He has worked in these fields for 
much of his adult life and after I reached my conclusions about the events 
in Paris, I rang him to ask if it would be possible to mind control Henri 
Paul to pick out that pillar at speed. Mark was in no doubt: “Yes, Yes” he 
said “More than yes, absolutely yes”. He pointed out that the subconscious 
worked much faster than the conscious mind and to the subconscious 80 miles 
an hour would actually be quite slow compared with its ability to think and 
react. If the speed was considerably slower as some reports suggest, it 
would have been even easier. “There are many techniques they could have used 
to programme his mind during those three hours he was missing”, Mark said. 
The number of ways they could have caused the crash, another vehicle, an 
explosive device, stun weapons, etc, etc, would fill a book and any of them 
is possible on the face of it. But not if they wanted to be sure of hitting 
the 13th pillar, which they did. To do that, they needed a driver with a 
programmed subconscious.
I think the stories about the mysterious Fiat Uno and the motorcyclist with 
the flashing light are diversions to lead researchers away from the simple 
truth. So much time and effort has been wasted on the Fiat in particular, 
fueled by Al Fayed’s own investigation team. Whenever such assassinations 
are staged, there are always a stream of false ‘clues’ and ‘leads’ which 
divert attention. The Kennedy assassination was full of them. Another 
possibility for the cause of the crash is external control of the car. 
Randulph Fiennes, famous for his polar expeditions, was an officer in the 
Royal Scots Greys and attached to the elite SAS. He wrote a book about a 
secret group of assassins called the Clinic and how they murdered people 
while making it look like an accident. The death of Major Michael Marman is 
particularly relevant to what could have happened in Paris. He was driving a 
Citroen 2CV along the A303 near Stonehenge in November 1986 when a BMW 
coming the other way careered across the carriageway and killed him 
instantly. Fiennes says that the BMW had been tampered with and the braking 
system was operated by remote control which could override the normal system 
via compressed air from a tiny scuba diving cylinder hidden in the engine 
compartment. The remote control equipment was operated from a Volvo which 
followed the BMW, Fiennes reported. The BMW was driven by Sir Peter Horsley, 
a retired Air Marshall, who survived the crash. Fiennes says that the Clinic 
knew that Horsley would be travelling along that road at the same time as 
their target. In his autobiography, Sounds From Another Room, Horsley says 
that he was accelerating to about 60 miles an hour when the car began to 
react strangely. He saw a grey Volvo closing up quickly behind him and as he 
was about to wave it past, his BMW spun sharply to the left, the brakes 
screeching, and then sharply to the right and back again. This is remarkably 
similar to what happened to the Mercedes before it struck the 13th pillar. 
Horsley was by now desperately trying to maintain control and he went on:
“Out of the corner of my eye I saw the grey Volvo accelerating past me at 
high speed. My car had now developed a mind of its own as it swung broadside 
and skidded down the road. With a lurch it hit the central reservation, 
mounted the grass verge separating the two• lanes of the highway and crossed 
over into the opposite carriageway. I had just time to see a small car 
approaching from the opposite direction. I hit it sideways on with 
tremendous force. In a split-second the driver’s horror-stricken face was 
visible and I heard his hoarse scream.”50


_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself with cool emoticons http://messenger.msn.co.uk